GROWL.......
Aug. 11th, 2018 11:44 pmI am so damned angry I can't see straight.
There is an attorney in Indianapolis who has never been competent at his job, who has always been a bit slimy and less than honorable and is now, if I am reading correctly between the lines, likely to be charged with child molesting. Real sweetheart.
About 14 years back there was a case in Indiana in which a trial judge ordered Pagan parents not to "expose their child to non-mainstream religions". No religious argument between the parents; it was all the judge's own idea. I hadn't been involved in the divorce, but I took the case the Court of Appeals, which appropriately drop-kicked the trial judge's order. It was, at it turned out, the last case I ever handled, and I have always considered it an appropriate swan song, and been very proud of it. It made international news at the time, to my shock.
So now recently Mr. Skeevy has been claiming that he handled that appeal and won it. That he's doing so got back to me by accident. The person who told me said "that was you, not him? That makes a lot more sense!" I'm glad to know she sees it that way.
I don't know that there's anything I can do about it, because at this point it's all either in private contexts or in a sealed juvenile proceeding. I'll look into possibilities in the morning. But for the attorney I most despise personally to claim credit for the achievement of which I am most proud? I am LIVID!
There is an attorney in Indianapolis who has never been competent at his job, who has always been a bit slimy and less than honorable and is now, if I am reading correctly between the lines, likely to be charged with child molesting. Real sweetheart.
About 14 years back there was a case in Indiana in which a trial judge ordered Pagan parents not to "expose their child to non-mainstream religions". No religious argument between the parents; it was all the judge's own idea. I hadn't been involved in the divorce, but I took the case the Court of Appeals, which appropriately drop-kicked the trial judge's order. It was, at it turned out, the last case I ever handled, and I have always considered it an appropriate swan song, and been very proud of it. It made international news at the time, to my shock.
So now recently Mr. Skeevy has been claiming that he handled that appeal and won it. That he's doing so got back to me by accident. The person who told me said "that was you, not him? That makes a lot more sense!" I'm glad to know she sees it that way.
I don't know that there's anything I can do about it, because at this point it's all either in private contexts or in a sealed juvenile proceeding. I'll look into possibilities in the morning. But for the attorney I most despise personally to claim credit for the achievement of which I am most proud? I am LIVID!