>>About 14 years back there was a case in Indiana in which a trial judge ordered Pagan parents not to "expose their child to non-mainstream religions". No religious argument between the parents; it was all the judge's own idea.<<
I remember that.
>> It was, at it turned out, the last case I ever handled, and I have always considered it an appropriate swan song, and been very proud of it.<<
Didn't know that was you, but awesome.
>> It made international news at the time, to my shock. <<
;) You're welcome. I helped with the activism end of that. Gosh, I don't even remember all the places, it's been so long. I'm sure I wrote about it and passed the word all over.
>>I don't know that there's anything I can do about it<<
You should certainly be able to nail him for fraud.
However, there's probably a better way. Contact whoever issues law licenses in your state, and tell them he's lying. Point them to the relevant case. If they choose to investigate, they should be able to access the material without you needing to do it. And you might like to point out that if he's lying about this, he's quite probably lying about other things. How much of the professional credentials he told them are even true? And do they want to back that? Perhaps not.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Well ...
Date: 2018-08-12 05:36 am (UTC)I remember that.
>> It was, at it turned out, the last case I ever handled, and I have always considered it an appropriate swan song, and been very proud of it.<<
Didn't know that was you, but awesome.
>> It made international news at the time, to my shock. <<
;) You're welcome. I helped with the activism end of that. Gosh, I don't even remember all the places, it's been so long. I'm sure I wrote about it and passed the word all over.
>>I don't know that there's anything I can do about it<<
You should certainly be able to nail him for fraud.
However, there's probably a better way. Contact whoever issues law licenses in your state, and tell them he's lying. Point them to the relevant case. If they choose to investigate, they should be able to access the material without you needing to do it. And you might like to point out that if he's lying about this, he's quite probably lying about other things. How much of the professional credentials he told them are even true? And do they want to back that? Perhaps not.